Effects of marine reserves within their boundaries
A global review of the scientific information about marine reserves revealed the following general trends:
Fishes, invertebrates, and seaweeds increased inside marine reserves.
- Biomass, or the mass of animals and plants, increased an average of 446%.
- Density, or the number of plants or animals in a given area, increased an average of 166%.
- Body Size of animals increased an average of 28%.
- Species Density, or the number of species, increased an average of 21% in the sample area.
Increases were similar between tropical and temperate reserves. This indicates that marine reserves can be effective regardless of latitude.
Heavily fished species often showed the most dramatic increases. Some fished species had more than 1000% higher biomass or density inside marine reserves.
Even small changes in species diversity and individual body size are important. These two indicators have less potential for change than do biomass or density, and even small changes are important (see below for more information on the effects of increasing body size).
No-take reserves may produce greater effects than MPAs that allow some fishing. See examples in studies conducted in Florida, USA and Kenya.
Why are bigger animals inside reserves so important?

Larger animals produce disproportionately more young than smaller individuals, so they contribute much more to the next generation. This increased reproduction inside marine reserves can also help to replenish nearby fished areas (see the section below on effects of marine reserves beyond their boundaries).
For example, a 50% increase in length of coral trout from 40 to 60 centimeters (16 to 24 inches) results in a 1000% increase in the number of young produced!
Read case studies from marine reserves around the world and lessons learned about the effective design of reserves and reserve networks.