IUCN IUCN - World Commission on Protected Areas


Web Protect Planet Ocean for my MPA

Marine protection news and updates

loading feeds...Loading feeds...
See last 250 » | See full archive »

Anacapa Island, California, USA

Fast Facts

  • Lobsters are 6 times more abundant in the Anacapa marine reserve. They eat more urchins, which graze on kelp. This results in healthier kelp forests inside than in fished areas outside.
  • Fishing has reduced lobsters outside the reserve, leading to 13 times more urchins.
  • Only kelp forests inside the marine reserve persisted through 20 years of climate shifts.
  • The intact food web inside the marine reserve appears to make the kelp forests more resilient than they are in fished areas.
  • Learn more about this MPA at our iMPA page

Photos

A healthy kelp forest at Anacapa Island.
Photo by Annie Crawley

A swarm of purple urchins, like this one near Anacapa Island, can transform a kelp forest to barren seafloor.
Photo by Annie Crawley

Marine Reserve Sustains Web of Life

Figure: presence or absence of kelp forest in a marine reserve and fished areas over time.

 

In 1978, the National Park Service established a marine reserve at Anacapa Island in southern California. The reserve was expanded in 2003 and a fished MPA was added. Throughout 2 decades of monitoring, the reserve has had a healthy kelp forest, while nearby fished areas frequently have been urchin barrens.

The difference is caused by the effects of fishing cascading through the food web. Outside the reserve, fishing reduced the number of spiny lobsters, which eat sea urchins. As a result, urchins were over 13 times more abundant than in the reserve, and they ate vast quantities of kelp. Meanwhile, lobsters became 6 times more abundant in the reserve because there was no fishing. By keeping urchins in check, lobsters enabled kelp forests to flourish in the reserve.

In the 1970s, all monitoring sites inside and outside the marine reserve had kelp forests. After the stressful climatic El Niño events in 1982-1983, however, some sites outside the marine reserve became barren, while sites inside still had kelp forests. The figure at right shows a period of 20 years, spanning 4 El Niño events, when a fished area (blue line) alternated between kelp forest and urchin barrens, but the marine reserve (green line) remained kelp forest. These findings suggest that kelp forests in the reserve may be more resilient to climatic stress than kelp forests in unprotected sites.

Learn more about this MPA at our iMPA page

Choose another case study

References

1. Behrens MD, Lafferty KD (2004) Marine Ecology Progress Series 279:129-139

2. Lafferty KD, Behrens MD (2005) In: Garcelon DK, Schwemm CA (eds)

Sixth California Islands Symposium. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Ventura, CA, p 511-520

Visit the PISCO Website

Visit the website of the Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans to learn more about the Science of Marine Reserves.

http://www.piscoweb.org/outreach/pubs/reserves

There you can download our booklets, video series, and high-resolution figures.